Todd Lesser

Preamble

This information listed here is sourced exclusively from public records at the City, State, and Federal levels. All the information contained herein is factual based upon the information obtained via these public records sources. This information is provided as is from the source documents that are linked in this article.

Background

The majority of recent AllStarLink, Inc. ("ASL") issues can be traced back to a time when Todd Lesser (KM6RPT) ("Todd") became a member of the Board of Directors. This was right after Tim Sawyer (WD6AWP) ("Tim") left, and Bryan Fields (W9CR) ("I"/"me") wanted to leave. However, I could not resign as that would leave 2 people as members of the Board of Directors and caused ASL to be in violation of Florida Statute (FS) 617. Todd then joined and I left shortly afterwards. After he assumed the board position, I was surprised at his lack of candor as he immediately began to hold information secret. Shocking as well was the return of Tim as a board member. After Tim's resignation due to an unrelated issue, no argument could be made to have him return.

My view of this is it was orchestrated to get me off the board and give Todd a means to exploit ASL. Keep in mind we (ASL) hadn't really know Todd prior to much of this. I was impressed he finally went out and got his tech license after Jim Dixon (WBNIL) ("Jim") passed, but other than him owning a Competitive Local Exchange Carrier (CLEC) ("North County Communications Corporation" or "NCCOM") no one really knew much about him. As a CLEC owner I thought he'd have a working knowledge of Asterisk and general telecom, but I had to show him how to SSH and configure the WB6NIL repeater (Node 2024) at his office to change it to his callsign.

After Todd became a member of the board, the board itself became very insular and refused to communicate with the ASL Admin Committee. This not only significantly impacted operations but also development and the morale the Admin Committee members in general. Later, Pete Elke (WI6H) ("Pete") and David Shaw (WB6WTM) ("David") joined the ASL Board of Directors. This resulted in the ASL Board of Directors becoming even more insular and secretive and I believe this was due, in no small part, to Todd's influence and leadership.

When we as a board negotiated to get assignment of the assets from Jim's estate, Todd had a serious concern regarding the other non-app_rpt/asterisk assets on Jim such as the MIPL software and it's associated marks. Due to ASL not having any Bylaws, any asset that ASL was in possession of or came into the possession of could be sold or transferred to anyone, as there were no protections against it nor was any asset held in trust or protected from normal sale or transfer. This means that any assets or intellectual property ("IP") transferred to ASL could be disposed in any means by a simple majority vote of the board.

For example: Any ASL asset could be sold off to a third party far below market value, or transferred. A member of the ASL Board of Directors could have a significant interest or business relationship with this entity, and after the sale/transfer they promptly resign. This third party and former ASL board member would now own the asset/IP that was transferred to it and could sell it for a profit, re-license it (even back to ASL itself), or do other means of monetization. This isbasically what happened with the Public Internet Registry ("PIR") which was owned by the Internet Society.

Such actions would be a major conflict of interest and was the reason Jim transferred control of AllStarLink to Steve Zingman (N4IRS) ("Steve") who was part of the initial incorporation of AllStarLink, Inc. in an effort to preserve the AllStarLink Network, assets, and ensure its continued operation.

I was always wondering why Todd was "chomping at the bit" when it came to ASL assets, and this finally started to make sense in late 2020:

Research showed that in September 2020, Todd had several pending lawsuits against him with judgements in excess of 2.5 Million as well as having property seized in San Diego for conspiring to distribute narcotics. Unfortunately, any initial research done on Todd was hampered by the poor access to public records in California vs. what Florida has under the Sunshine Act. There was also some limited information in the Federal Courts under PACER.

What was clear is that he had filed bankruptcy at least twice in the last 5 years and been involved in litigation against two major telecom carriers in the Federal courts.

Case Summary

It's clear in these cases that North County Communications ("NCCOM") engaged in a practice know as "access stimulation". In short NCCOM is a phone company and as a phone company is permitted to bill other phone companies for calls to the CLEC's customers. Typically these rates are in the .01 or .02 cents per minute and this is the same for all carriers, known as a tariff. This tariff can be much higher in certain areas of the US, as is the case typically were phone service is provided by non-Regional Bell Operating Company (RBOC) Incumbent local exchange carrier (ILEC) phone companies, and can be .02-.04 cents per minute. A CLECs operating in these higher tariff areas by service customers make more money. These areas tend to be rural and not populated, thus being more expensive for the CLEC to provide services in.

CLECs operating in these areas and billing the ILECs in excess of a million minutes per month was not unheard of. As you can imagine, this netted quite a sizeable profit for the CLECs.

Typically, these calls are only permitted to be charged for customer to customer calls, any automated calls or chat lines (typically sexual in nature) are not subjected to these fees. Additionally, they tend to only be a small part of the inbound calls as most legitimate chat lines use an 800 or 900 number and require a customer to pay via credit card for the call. These chat line operators are also separate businesses from the CLEC.

If the sex chat operator can find a less than honorable CLEC, they can enter into a business agreement where calls to the chat line from a local number are "free" to the caller that "exists" in one of these higher tariff areas. The CLEC in turn uses this "access stimulation" to for several million minutes a month to calls in this high tariff area and then bill the RBOC ILEC instead of the customer at this higher rate. The result is the CLEC collecting several million dollars of "profit" per month from the chat line operator providing the "access stimulation" needed.

In all cases below Todd is the owner of NCCOM sex chat line operator HFT, Inc. ("HF). In the filings we can find HFT never paid NCCOM for access as a typical customer of a CLEC would. Instead HTF existed only to stimulate calls for NCCOM in these high tariff areas, who in turn billed the ILEC and pocketed the money collected. This is an arrangement which viewed though the best of intentions would be considered fraudulent.

In the Mid 2000's most carriers began auditing to find this sort of operation via call detail records ("CDR") auditing. The use of the Signalling System No 7 ("SS7) interconnect protocol along with modern auditing software sold by the major telecom vendors helped in the cracking down on this fraudulent behavior by CLECs. The use of the SS7 protocol in the US was mandated by the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC") via a rule the passed in 2011 .

Under the laws in the mid 2000's most carriers had to sue or petition the FCC for redress. In some cases they refused to pay the fraudulent bills by the CLEC's and the CLEC would sue the big carrier. This is indeed what NCC did, suing Verizon, MetroPCS, TMO and Vaya Telecom for failure to pay their interconnection charges. In all cases these ended up with judgements against NCC and Todd Lesser personally.

Federal Records

In PACER We found Todd/NCC sued or counter-sued by Verizon, Sprint, TMO and other carriers for billing irregularities related to access stimulation.

FCC

Before the FCC Sprint and T-Mobile 2015-01-23 Joint Statement to FCC regarding discovery Sprint v NCC fcc-60001016009

STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED FACTS:

13: All revenues of NCC and HFT are for the benefit of Mr. Lesser.
17: NCC’s traffic from Sprint is “100 percent chat line traffic.”15
25: In a lawsuit against Vaya Telecom pending in state court in California, NCC was

sanctioned $92,966.45 for discovery violations, including violations of court orders to produce financial records involving transactions between NCC and HFT 61. Mr. Lesser testified in the Sprint matter that he created the invoices on a monthly basis in custom software that he wrote himself

66: After NCC produced the invoices, Verizon obtained an order directing NCC to produce all computer drives it used to create, modify, or manipulate those invoices so that a court-appointed expert could test whether the HFT invoices were, as in Farmers II, backdated.63 The neutral forensic expert appointed by the District Court examined the two drives Mr. Lesser produced – an Apple iBook G-4 laptop hard drive (“Mac Computer”) and a removable USB flash drive (“Thumb Drive”).64 (Compl. ¶ 102; but see Answer ¶ 115)

70Todd Admits to deleting the bash history and log of commands during discovery. 71: The District Court sanctioned NCC for evidence destruction

Bankruptcy Court

Todd Lesser has filed bankruptcy a couple times that can be found in PACER. What is interesting is these were filed pro-se, or without an attorney. In both cases the case was dismissed for failure to prosecute by Mr. Lesser.

Upon review of the records from San Diego County, it was found both these filings aligned with foreclosure proceedings on his residence or business. This is a well known tactic, as a bankruptcy filing will pause all foreclosure actions giving time to the debtor, and encouraging the holder of the loan to settle. In both cases Mr. Lesser was able to re-mortgage or finance his residence, and then have the court dismiss the case. In the second time in 2019 he entered into a trust agreement with his father loaning him over 1,000,000 dollars.

San Diego County

Our search in San Diego produced the following.

Of the most interesting was his judgements from NCC vs. Vaya Telecom. This case was essentially the same as the federal actions on access stimulation and took years to bring to trial/appeal/final judgement. Now the final judgments are done and the court has held NCC, HFT, Inc. and Todd Lessor personally and jointly liable

• 2019-03-22 - 92,966.45 sanction on Todd Lessor personally for schenagians during discovery.
• 2020-06-06 - 597,474.38 judgment against Todd Lessor and his companies.
• 2020-12-02 - 1,357,154.27 judgment against Todd Lessor and his companies.

2017-0444025 136,727.96 - Bank of America judgement 2017-0441050 6088.86 - Discover Card Bank

Narcotics Forfeiture

Todd Lesser has been sanctioned twice by the City of San Diego for operating an unlicensed narcotics distribution site on his property. This is the same property address he has listed on his FCC Amateur Radio License https://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/UlsSearch/license.jsp?licKey=4013923

https://casetext.com/case/city-of-san-diego-v-4008-taylor-st-llc

https://www.sandiego.gov/sites/default/files/nr171101a1.pdf

https://www.sandiegometro.com/2017/11/daily-business-report-nov-2-2017/

2018-0126301.pdf - this is the second time around

2017-0214411.pdf - Forfeiture action against Todd Lesser by city of San Diego

In this case, Todd Lesser was held personally responsible for 200,000.00 dollars for willfully defying a temporary injunction by the court. This was the second such business he allowed to operate at this location involved in narcotics distribution.

Property Foreclosures

Mutiple times in the past 5 years Todd Lesser residence at 2717 Hidden Valley Rd. La Jolla CA 92037 has gone into for failure to pay the mortgage as agreeded.

Todd has previously used his residence in such a fashion with a private note from a Yvonne Smith in april 2018 of 400,000.00 Dollars. 2018-0160972.pdf

In december 2019 Todd Lesser has borrowed 1,043,440.00 on this propert from his father Dr. Donald Yost Lesser on this property. This coincided with Todd Lesser's bankruptcy and Lis Pendens from his mortgage holder. It remains to be seen if Donald Lesser is being paid as agreed under this trust 2019-0585335.pdf

Filing False Lis Pendens

In 2006 Todd Lesser made an offer to purchase a property from John Raymond managing member of Surfstone LLC. This offer expired and Todd Lesser preceded as if it was signed and agreed too. Todd Lesser then filed a Lis Pendens on the property and the property owner sued to have it revoked by the court.

In 20006-0378821.pdf the court held this was not a proper lis pendens and sanctioned Todd Lesser and dismissed the action by him.

Local Politics

Todd Lesser seems to desire involvement in the politics of his city in any form. He's served and resigned from a couple minor city boards with limited powers. In several cases he's protested the election or findings of the board when such actions have gone against his postions or interests.

La Jolla Shores Association

http://www.sdnews.com/view/full_story/22368481/article-Tempers-flare-over-officer-election-at-LJSA

https://www.lajollalight.com/sdljl-shores-association-address-election-challenge-2015-2015may21-story.html

Todd argues over flipping a coin. His attorney makes a case that a strict following of Robers Rules of Order is Required.

La Jolla Traffic and Transportation Board

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pnmO2oYJYaM

Final Thoughts

Our research only covered one county in California. It's not unreasonable to assume other counties may have other such actions in their court systems, especially in places Todd Lesser has conducted his businesses.

From the above it would appear Todd Lesser's choice of professions have been based mostly on less than ethical choices and that has been catching up with him. Having worked with him in the past I know he loves to talk until he is able to get his way. It takes a strong person to stand up and say "No" to him.

As we have added up over $2,500,000 (2.5 million) dollars in debts he is personally liable for, and his pattern of being less than truthful under oath one must question what was wrong with the prior AllStarLink Board of Directors in letting him direct most of the corporation. AllStarLink now is in a position of operating in debt and one can envision Todd Lesser wanting to sell off assets to fund it while also benefiting himself.